+- Music Discussion (https://www.music-discussion.com)
+-- Forum: Music Discussion (https://www.music-discussion.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: General Music (https://www.music-discussion.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=18)
+--- Thread: Better than Mumford and Sons? (/showthread.php?tid=7642)
Pages:
1
2
Better than Mumford and Sons? - Music Head - 21-06-2013
Jerome Wrote:Almost anything is better than M&S. They are just way too overrated. If you start dismantling their material you will find very little substance.
You just don't like em cause they use a banjo
Better than Mumford and Sons? - SteveO - 22-06-2013
Ya , Jerome you don;t like them cause they use a banjo ...LMFAO ...so there !...lol
Music Head Wrote:You just don't like em cause they use a banjo
RE: Better than Mumford and Sons? - Jerome - 06-08-2020
This might surprise you but I actually bought a banjo to play a melodic line on one of my tracks. Realised I could not play the damn thing at all. Got John Zytaruk to do the part and donated the banjo to the local pub where it still lives, and gets played, after copious amounts of alcohol have been consumed.
RE: Better than Mumford and Sons? - CRAZY-HORSE - 06-08-2020
LOL
you play a lot of instruments and you say you cant play the bnajo...interesting yet familliar comment.
Paul McCartney is a multi-instrumentalist as you probably know.
the shop that gets him his guitars sent him a Ukulele around twenty years ago, he tried and tried but couldnt get the hang of it, had to take lessons to understand the basics of it LOL