![]() |
|
An album you consider a treat - Printable Version +- Music Discussion (https://www.music-discussion.com) +-- Forum: Music Discussion (https://www.music-discussion.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: General Music (https://www.music-discussion.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=18) +--- Thread: An album you consider a treat (/showthread.php?tid=2830) |
An album you consider a treat - Leftfield Shoegazer - 04-03-2010 Does any of you guys have any albums you love, but only listen to rarely (as a treat really) because you'd be afraid that if you play them too much, you'd get fed up of them? I have three I ALWAYS come back to, but listen to them rarely:- 1) THE CURE - Disintegration 2) REM - Automatic For The People 3) MARK HOLLIS - Mark Hollis I'd say these albums are completely flawless IMO. An album you consider a treat - Music Head - 04-03-2010 I guess pretty much all of my albums fall into this category, considering the size of my library (around 4000 titles), and I don't play anything over until it comes back up again in the rotation. The only exception to that is when I buy something new, it gets heavy play for a week or so. Latest estimate, it takes me around 5 years to go through my collection. An album you consider a treat - Tiggi - 05-03-2010 I'm very much the same as Ed, but tend not to do the heavy rotation bit with new albums. Things get a bit ceremonial when the Pink Floyd albums come out... An album you consider a treat - gryphon - 05-03-2010 I can't say that, if it is an album I love I will get tired of it........I tend to feel the opposite .......If it is a true classic then to me , it will stand the test of time......if it is well recorded and has been lovingly crafted by the artist and producer..then I will always be able to find a new part or hear it in a new context..................Also as I experience new pieces of music , I often find this allows me a new window on older classics that somehow mature into this new context and sound even better.
|