04-01-2008, 21:46
I'm guessing they would be unsigned coz I can't imagine label consent being given to the contrary. However, I think it is inevitable that more artists will move over.
Signed independent artists probably make 'buttons'. Neither that model nor this new one will prevent illegal sharing. However, by signing up to this model, each download would generate artist income.
Provided it grows big enough and attracts major advertisers, it's going to encourage lot's of bands to dip their toes. The cost of self produced albums is not prohibitive and compares well to the label's 'we've recovered our bit, there's you're £20!' contracts.
Ultimately, get Radiohead and/or Trent Reznor (Nine Inch Nails) [both of who have expressed dissatisfaction with the current norm] on board and it would become very interesting to see who follows next.
Signed independent artists probably make 'buttons'. Neither that model nor this new one will prevent illegal sharing. However, by signing up to this model, each download would generate artist income.
Provided it grows big enough and attracts major advertisers, it's going to encourage lot's of bands to dip their toes. The cost of self produced albums is not prohibitive and compares well to the label's 'we've recovered our bit, there's you're £20!' contracts.
Ultimately, get Radiohead and/or Trent Reznor (Nine Inch Nails) [both of who have expressed dissatisfaction with the current norm] on board and it would become very interesting to see who follows next.

